Main reasons that good books should be bought in print
Main reasons that good books should be bought in print
Blog Article
It is coming to be increasingly uncommon to do things offline, away from a screen; here is why it is nice to keep books offline.
In this day and age we invest a lot of our time looking at screens. Our work is very often on screens, and they are becoming a much bigger part of our working life, and the way that we relax tends to use screens, and, possibly unsurprisingly, they ae turning into an even larger part of our relaxation too. For much of us, relaxation is associated with watching films or television, all of which is done on a screen, or perhaps reading a book, which had managed to avoid the monopolisation of the screen until quite recently. Books are one of the oldest technologies that we still use today, with the book as we know it today being pretty much unchanged for about two thousand years now. Although eBooks may have been offered as the inescapable development of the book, maybe having at least something in your life that you do far from a screen is good reason enough to stay away from them. Individuals like the co-founder of the impact investor with a stake in World of Books would most likely value the appeal of checking out a book without the requirement for a screen.
So much of our lives now exists online. From our work to our entertainment and our shopping, the internet now touches almost every part of our lives. Although the internet has actually absolutely made a great deal of things a lot easier and much more accessible for a great many people, it does take away from some things. Shopping for beautiful books in a lovely little bookshop, for instance, is definitely better than just hitting 'order' when buying them online. People like the co-CEO of the hedge fund that owns Waterstones would most likely value the happiness of offline shopping in bookshops.
We are frequently told that technology is the inescapable development of things, a vital improvement that they would not survive without, but is this in fact correct? It is an easy myth to buy into, we have all knowledgeable how cell phones have actually made our lives simpler, giving us access to more things than we understand how what to do with, however we also know how it has actually damaged us as well. And lots of things have in fact quite stubbornly resisted digitalisation, like books. Although it might have been expected that online books would make their print predecessors a thing of the past, that has actually not occurred at all, possibly speaking to the limits of digitalisation and blowing a book-shaped hole in the misconception of technological progress. People like the CEO of the asset manager with a stake in Amazon books might know how books have withstood being technologically updated.